{"id":3001,"date":"2024-10-31T08:03:53","date_gmt":"2024-10-31T08:03:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/?p=3001"},"modified":"2024-10-31T08:03:54","modified_gmt":"2024-10-31T08:03:54","slug":"praxis-seminar-2024-25-s3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/praxis-seminar-2024-25-s3\/","title":{"rendered":"Praxis Seminar: Research Colloquium in Practical Philosophy 2024\/25, Session 3"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sjoerd van Tuinen<\/p>\n<p>Erasmus University Rotterdam<\/p>\n<h5><em>Frogs in the Swamp: A Critique of Menno ter Braak and other Liberal Discourses on Ressentiment<\/em><\/h5>\n<p>5 November 2024, 17h00 (Lisbon Time \u2014 GMT+0)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sala Mattos Rom\u00e3o (Room C201.J \u2013 Department of Philosophy)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>School of Arts and Humanities \u2013 University of Lisbon<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As the post-2016 boom in the self-diagnostics of toxic liberalism shows, the concept of ressentiment is still one of today&#8217;s main \u2018ideologemes\u2019 (Jameson). It is an ideologeme because, while having a strong morally disqualifying power, it offers no way out of the political impasse it describes. Here I propose a critique of the 1937 essay by the Dutch writer Menno ter Braak, \u2018National Socialism as a Doctrine of Rancor\u2019 (translated and published for the first time in English in Theory, Culture &amp; Society in 2019) as the basis for a wider critique of \u2018pastoral\u2019 discourses on ressentiment. First, I argue that ressentiment initially and primarily names a bourgeois phenomenon and problem, and as such is an articulation of what Ranci\u00e8re has aptly called a \u2018hatred of democracy\u2019: liberal democracy is held responsible for all social problems as it inherently summons forth a bad infinity of emancipatory struggle (\u2018fanaticism\u2019, \u2018utopism\u2019) that must be disqualified. Second, I show how ressentiment functions as a label for bourgeois self-legitimation: in discerning ressentiment everywhere, a claim is made to good conscience on the basis of either a more rational or a more authentic relation to one\u2019s own ressentiment. It is this esprit de s\u00e9rieux that culminates in Ter Braak\u2019s hypocritical statement that \u2018one will have to begin, for example, by speaking less disparagingly about the \u201cbunch of losers\u201d, because one cannot overestimate the extent of the reservoir of latent rancour.\u2019 Third, I will briefly touch upon ways in which other discourses on ressentiment &#8211; those of Nietzsche and of the diplomat as invoked by ter Braak at the outset of his essay &#8211; seek to overcome this seriousness and contrast these other discourses with a discourse that is at risk of deepening it &#8211; in particular that of Am\u00e9ry.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sjoerd van Tuinen Erasmus University Rotterdam Frogs in the Swamp: A Critique of Menno ter Braak and other Liberal Discourses on Ressentiment 5 November 2024, 17h00 (Lisbon Time \u2014 GMT+0) Sala Mattos Rom\u00e3o (Room C201.J \u2013 Department of Philosophy) School of Arts and Humanities \u2013 University of Lisbon &nbsp; Abstract As the post-2016 boom in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"","activitypub_status":"federate","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3001"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3004,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3001\/revisions\/3004"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}