{"id":1656,"date":"2020-01-23T13:17:26","date_gmt":"2020-01-23T13:17:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/?p=1656"},"modified":"2020-02-26T21:03:31","modified_gmt":"2020-02-26T21:03:31","slug":"praxis-seminar-session-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/praxis-seminar-session-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Praxis Seminar: Research Colloquium in Practical Philosophy, Session 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Gavin Rae<\/p>\n<p>Complutense University of Madrid<\/p>\n<h5><em>Strategies of Political Resistance: Agamben and Irigaray<\/em><\/h5>\n<p><strong>4 February 2020, 18:00 h<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Room B6 &#8211; Library Building<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Faculty of Arts and Humanities &#8211; University of Lisbon<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This talk focuses on the thought of Giorgio Agamben and Luce Irigaray to engage with the question of political resistance. Little work has been done to bring these two thinkers together, but my guiding contention is that there are important overlaps between them, especially on this issue. To develop this, I first outline Agamben\u2019s analysis of <em>homo sacer<\/em> and related claim that Western juridical-political systems are structured around a binary exclusion\/inclusion opposition that is used to regulate life (<em>zoe<\/em>) itself. Although there is significant contention in the literature regarding whether Agamben offers the possibility of moving beyond this logic, I argue that he does and focus on his analysis of the Aristotelian conception of \u2018potentiality,\u2019 from which he derives the notions of \u2018impotentiality,\u2019 \u2018inoperativity,\u2019 and \u2018destituent-power\u2019 to develop a political strategy that argues for the initial deactivation of the biopolitical machine to permit a space to subsequent re-conceive what he calls the coming politics. On first glance, Irigaray\u2019s critique of the West\u2019s phallogocentrism appears to have little to do with Agamben\u2019s biopolitical project, but I will argue that it actually shares a number of its logical presuppositions, insofar as she claims that Western thinking on sexual difference has been structured around a binary opposition wherein \u2018woman\u2019 is devalued and excluded from (masculine-defined) law, with this permitting the phallogocentric regime to better regulate her life. I subsequently show that, in her early work, Irigaray points to the political importance of mimicry and laughter to \u2018jam the theoretical machine\u2019 sustaining phallogocentrism to subsequently permit a rethinking of sexual difference in non-phallogocentric terms. I conclude that with this Agamben and Irigaray share a common political project that aims to move us from a politics of conflict and contestation to one based around a logic of disarmament and deactivation, before raising some critical questions regarding this endeavour.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gavin Rae Complutense University of Madrid Strategies of Political Resistance: Agamben and Irigaray 4 February 2020, 18:00 h Room B6 &#8211; Library Building Faculty of Arts and Humanities &#8211; University of Lisbon &nbsp; Abstract This talk focuses on the thought of Giorgio Agamben and Luce Irigaray to engage with the question of political resistance. Little [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1656"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1656\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1800,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1656\/revisions\/1800"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/praxis\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}