{"id":1449,"date":"2022-05-14T19:04:48","date_gmt":"2022-05-14T18:04:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/seminar-series-in-analytic-philosophy-2021-22-extra-session-1\/"},"modified":"2022-05-14T19:04:48","modified_gmt":"2022-05-14T18:04:48","slug":"seminar-series-in-analytic-philosophy-2021-22-extra-session-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/seminar-series-in-analytic-philosophy-2021-22-extra-session-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Seminar Series in Analytic Philosophy 2021-22, Extra Session 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Epistemic trespassing and epistemic free-riding<\/strong><br \/>\nLu\u00eds Estevinha Rodrigues (Federal University of Cear\u00e1)<\/p>\n<p>20 May 2022, 11:00 (Lisbon Time \u2013 WET) | Sala Mattos Rom\u00e3o (Departamento de Filosofia)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract: <\/strong>Experts and non-experts become epistemic trespassers by making judgments about issues belonging to scientific fields where they lack competence, evidence, or both (Ballantyne 2019; DiPaolo 2021). These invasions are usually documented as epistemically illegitimate and create malignant theoretical and social consequences. I argue in this talk that this kind of epistemic transgression is closely related to another: doxastic free-riding, a subset of epistemic free-ridding. After reviewing some examples of these transgressions enacted by experts and non-experts, I generate an explanatory pattern of their association. In the end, I use this pattern to distinguish epistemic trespassing from interdisciplinary cooperation.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>The room has a limited number of seats. Pre-registration is required at &lt;info@lancog.com&gt; until a day before the event.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Epistemic trespassing and epistemic free-riding Lu\u00eds Estevinha Rodrigues (Federal University of Cear\u00e1) 20 May 2022, 11:00 (Lisbon Time \u2013 WET) | Sala Mattos Rom\u00e3o (Departamento de Filosofia) &nbsp; Abstract: Experts and non-experts become epistemic trespassers by making judgments about issues belonging to scientific fields where they lack competence, evidence, or both (Ballantyne 2019; DiPaolo 2021). [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1449"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1449\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cful.letras.ulisboa.pt\/lancog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}